Planet [for the] MySQL Community: Pluto Beta

As indicated in a previous post, I am working on Planet [for the] MySQL Community for which I did a RFC on the Requirements.  I am happy to announce the beta release of Planet [for the] MySQL Community using the Planet Pluto Free Feed Reader and (Static) Website Generator.  If you are in a hurry, you can check it out at http://planet-beta-pluto.oursqlcommunity.org/.  This post describes how I got there, how it was built, how it works and a little more.

Planet MySQL Community: Requirements RFC

As indicated in a previous post, I am working on a Planet MySQL Community (this name is not final, see below).  In this post, I want to present what I think the requirements should be for this new aggregator.  This is a Request for Comment (RFC): I do not claim completeness nor perfection, this might (will) evolve, and your remarks are welcome.  A tl&dr is available in the Summary of Requirements below.

Planning for the AFTER Planet MySQL (bis)

Oups, my previous post had a forbidden word and did not show-up on Planet MySQL, so retry...

As written in a previous post, the state of Planet MySQL is unhealthy !  I am still aggregated there for now as, before leaving what was the best news-feed for the MySQL Community, we need a replacement.  This post aims at starting a discussion on this replacement.

Planning for the AFTER Planet MySQL

As written in my previous post, the state of Planet MySQL is unhealthy !  I am still aggregated there for now as, before leaving what was the best news-feed for the MySQL Community, we need a replacement.  This post aims at starting a discussion on this replacement.

State of Planet MySQL: unhealthy !

Also, the state of bugs.mysql.com: unhealthy (last paragraph below, but this would be too long a title).

I have been complaining for some time about Planet MySQL filtering content that I think it should not.  Shlomi made a courageous decision on this and explained it in his recent post (Pulling his blog out of Planet MySQL aggregator, over community concerns).  I am thinking of doing the same.  What are your thoughts on this ?  Please share them in the comments below (or on Shlomi's blog).

JFG MySQL Advice during COVID-19

Update 2020-05-05: I stopped providing consulting hours.  They were not very popular, but it was worth trying.

We are all impacted by COVID-19.  On my side, this virus disrupted my travel, professional and personal plans for the upcoming months.  To overcome these disruptions, and following the idea of someone on MySQL Community Slack, I am experimenting with giving MySQL advice on a 30-minute basis.  You can book a slot using this link:

• https://jfg-mysql.blogspot.com/p/jfg-mysql-advice-during-covid-19.html

While booking, you will be asked to describe what you want to discuss.  I will confirm the meeting by mail if it is a subject I can help you with.  The discussion can be on Skype, Google Hangout, or your favorite video conferencing system (while booking, you will be asked for it).

This is an experiment !  I opened consulting hours between March 31st and April 11th.  If this goes well, I will add more; if it does not go well, I will cancel everything.  Also, I will do my best to answer your questions and help you with your MySQL challenges, but I cannot replace a full-time DBA on your team.  Also, I will not be able to get a complete picture of your situation in such a short time, so you will have to be smart in deciding if you want to follow my advice or not.

Good luck to you all and courage during these strange times !

A Legacy Behavior of MySQL Corrupting Restored Backups (replicate-same-server-id = OFF)

In my previous post (Puzzled by MySQL Replication), I describe a weird, but completely documented, behavior of replication that had me scratching my head for hours because it was causing data corruption.  I did not give too many details then as I also wanted allowing you to scratch your head if you wished.  In this post, I describe this behavior in more details.

Puzzled by MySQL Replication (War Story)

Recently, I was puzzled by MySQL replication !  Some weird, but completely documented, behavior of replication had me scratching my head for hours.  I am sharing this war story so you can avoid losing time like me (and also maybe avoid corrupting your data when restoring a backup).  The exact justification will come in a follow-up post, so you can also scratch your head trying to understand what I faced.  So let's dive-in.

The dark side of super_read_only

There is an interesting feature in MySQL 5.7+: the global variable super_read_only.  MySQL 5.6 and before only had the read_only global variable which is not preventing a user with SUPER privilege to write to the database.  With super_read_only, those users cannot write anymore.  But this feature comes with a surprise.

MySQL Master Replication Crash Safety Part #5a: making things faster without reducing durability - using better hardware

This is a follow-up post in the MySQL Master Replication Crash Safety series.  In the previous posts, we explored the consequences of reducing durability on masters (different data inconsistencies after an OS crash depending on replication type) and the performance boost associated with this configuration (benchmark results done on Google Cloud Platform / GCP).  The consequences are summarised in the introduction of Part #4, and the tests are the subject of this last post.  Also in this last post, I mentioned that my results for high durability are limited by the sync latencies of GCP persistent disks.  As I found a system with better latencies, I am able to present new results.  And this system is a vm in Amazon Web Services (AWS) with local SSD.

MySQL Master Replication Crash Safety Part #5: faster without reducing durability (under the hood)

This post is a sister post to MySQL Master Replication Crash Safety Part #5: making things faster without reducing durability.  There is no introduction or conclusion to this post, only landing sections: reading this post without its context is not not recommended. You should start with the main post and come back here for more details.

MySQL Master Replication Crash Safety Part #4: benchmarks of high and low durability

This is a follow-up post in the MySQL Master Replication Crash Safety series.  In the three previous posts, we explored the consequence of reducing durability on masters (including setting sync_binlog to a value different from 1).  But so far, I only quickly presented why a DBA would run MySQL with such configuration.  In this post, I present actual benchmark results.  I also present a fundamental difference between on-premise servers and cloud virtual machines as my tests are done in Google Cloud Platform (GCP).  But before going further, let's summarise the previous posts.

MySQL Master Replication Crash Safety part #4: benchmarks (under the hood)

This post is a sister post to MySQL Master Replication Crash Safety Part #4: benchmarks of high and low durability.  There are no introduction or conclusion to this post, only landing sections: reading this post without its context is not recommended. You should start with the main post and come back here for more details.

Getting past 2400 threads with sysbench and dbdeployer for benchmarking MySQL 5.7.26

I am currently running tests with sysbench and dbdeployer on a Google Cloud Platform Debian 9 instance.  I ran into an interesting limit and lifting it was not straightforward.  I hope that by sharing this, you can avoid losing too much time.

Not enforcing SSL on CloudSQL, really !

When creating a MySQL CloudSQL instance, SSL connections are not enforced by default and you get below in the Connections tab of the Google Cloud Platform console.  Is this a problem ?  Some people might think no, but I do not agree with them.  And if I am writing this post, you can probably guess that there is a lot to say about this subject.  Read on for the details.

Care with using the max_connections beta database flag on CloudSQL...

War story of the day: do not use — or be very careful when using — the max_connections beta database flag on CloudSQL... because it has many bugs.

MySQL Master High Availability and Failover: more thoughts

Some months ago, Shlomi Noach published a series about Service Discovery.  In his posts, Shlomi describes many ways for an application to find the master.  He also gives detail on how these solutions cope with failover to a slave, including their integration with Orchestrator.

This is a great series, and I recommend its reading for everybody implementing master failover, with or without Orchestrator, and even if you are not fully automating the process yet.  Taking a step back, I realized that service discovery is only one of the five parts of a full MySQL Master Failover Strategy, and this post is about these five parts.  In some follow-up posts, I might analyze some deployments using the framework presented in this post.

MySQL Master Replication Crash Safety Part #3: GTID

This is a follow-up post in the MySQL Master Replication Crash Safety series.  In the two previous posts, we explored the consequence of reducing durability on masters (including setting sync_binlog to a value different than 1) when slaves are using legacy file+position replication.  In this post, we cover GTID replication.  This introduces a new inconsistency scenario with a potential replication breakage that depends on transaction execution on the master and timing on the slave.  Before discussing this violation of ACID, we start with some reminders about the last posts and with some explanations about GTIDs.

Care when changing MASTER_DELAY with CHANGE MASTER TO (delayed replication)

A few days ago, I stepped into a trap !  This made me lose time for fixing things (and even more for writing this post...).  In the hope that you will avoid my mistake, I am sharing this war story.  I also obviously opened a bug, more about this below.

TL&DR: be careful when using CHANGE MASTER TO MASTER_DELAY = N: it might wipe your relay logs !

MySQL Master Replication Crash Safety Part #2: lagging slaves

This is Part #2 of the MySQL Master Replication Crash Safety series.  In the previous post, we explored the consequence of reducing durability on masters with slaves using legacy file+position replication.  The consequences are data inconsistencies with a clear warning sign: the slaves stop replicating and report an error.  In this post, we extend our understanding of the impact of running a master with sync_binlog != 1 by considering lagging slaves that are using file+position replication.  This introduces a new inconsistency scenario without replication breakage, which is trickier to detect.  But let's start with some reminders.

How to install Percona Server 5.7 on Debian/Ubuntu without a root password prompt

In the last few months, I had to install Percona Server 5.7 (PS5.7) on Debian a few times.  I was regularly annoyed by apt-get -y install percona-server-server-5.7 prompting me for a password.  But that annoyance did not push me to investigate the subject in detail: it was always a quick manual fix and Googling did not lead to a straightforward solution.  However in the last days, I had to install PS5.7 on many servers, so it was worth finding how to do this.  I am writing this post in the hope that it will help some people...

On the consequences of sync_binlog != 1 (part #1)

A well-known performance booster in MySQL is to set sync_binlog to 0.  However, this configuration alone comes with serious consequences on consistency and on durability (the C and D of ACID); I explore those in this series.  In this post, I give some background on the sync_binlog parameter and I explain part of the problem with setting it to 0 (or to a value different from 1).  The other problems — including the behaviour with GTIDs (I am limiting the current scope to legacy file + position replication) — and some solutions are the subject of the upcoming posts.

Arg: relay_log_space_limit is (still) not dynamic !

This will be a short rant: why is relay_log_space_limit still not dynamic ?

Unforeseen use case of my GTID work: replicating from AWS Aurora to Google CloudSQL

A colleague brought an article to my attention.  I did not see it on Planet MySQL where I get most of the MySQL news (or it did not catch my eye there).  As it is interesting replication stuff, I think it is important to bring it to the attention of the MySQL Community, so I am writing this short post.

The surprising part for me is that it uses my 4-year-old work for online migration to GTID with MySQL 5.6.  This is a completely unforeseen use case of my work as I never thought that my hack would be useful after Oracle include an online migration path to GTID in MySQL 5.7 (Percona did something similar for MySQL 5.6).

Another Post on the Percona Community Blog, Bug Activities on Replication Crash Safety, and Percona Live Europe

I published another article on the Percona Community Blog.  This time, it is about Semi-Synchronous Replication.  You can read the post here:

• Question about Semi-Synchronous Replication: the Answer with all the Details

I previously wrote about my motivation to publish on the Percona Community Blog.  Things have not changed: I still believe it is a great community initiative that I want to encourage.  You can learn more about the Percona Community Blog in their Hello World and in the Story So Far posts.

JFG Posted on the Percona Community Blog - A Nice Feature in MariaDB 10.3: no InnoDB Buffer Pool in Core Dumps

I just posted an article on the Percona Community Blog.  You can access it following this link:

• A Nice Feature in MariaDB 10.3: no InnoDB Buffer Pool in Core Dumps

I do not know if I will stop publishing posts on my personal blog or use both, I will see how things go.  In the rest of this post, I will share why I published there and how things went in the process.

Some bugs and spring pilgrimage to Percona Live Santa Clara 2018

I am now in an airport, waiting for one of the four flights that will bring me to Percona Live Santa Clara 2018.  This is a good time to write some details about my tutorial on parallel replication.  But before talking about Percona Live, I will share thoughts on MySQL/MariaDB bugs that caught my attention in the last weeks/months (Valeriy: you clearly have an influence on me).

Next week in Brussels: Parallel Replication at the MySQL Pre-FOSDEM Day

FOSDEM is next weekend and I am talking about Parallel Replication on Friday, February 2nd at the MySQL Pre-FOSDEM Day (there might be tickets left in case of cancellation, attendance is free of charge).  During this talk, I will show benchmark results of MySQL 8.0 parallel replication on Booking.com real production environments.  I thought I could share a few things before the talk so here it is.

More Write Set in MySQL: Group Replication Certification

This is the third post in the series on Write Set in MySQL.  In the first post, we explore how Write Set allows to get better parallel replication in MySQL 8.0.  In the second post, we saw how the MySQL 8.0 improvement is an extension of the work done in MySQL 5.7 to avoid replication delay/lag in Group Replication.  In this post, we will see how Write Set is used in Group Replication to detect conflicts in multi-writer mode during certification.  We will also see the impacts, on conflict detection, of the Write Set bug that I presented in the first post.

Write Set in MySQL 5.7: Group Replication

In my previous post, I write that Write Set is not only in MySQL 8.0 but also in MySQL 5.7 though a little hidden.  In this post, I describe Write Set in 5.7 and this will bring us in the inner-working of Group Replication.  I am also using this opportunity to explain and show why members of a group can replicate faster than a standard slave.  We will also see the impacts, on Group Replication, of the Write Set bug that I presented in my last post.

An update on Write Set (parallel replication) bug fix in MySQL 8.0

In my MySQL Parallel Replication session at Percona Live Santa Clara 2017, I talked about a bug in Write Set tracking for parallel replication (Bug#86078).  At the time, I did not fully understand what was going wrong but since then, we (Engineers at Oracle and me) understood what happened and the bug is supposed to be fixed in MySQL 8.0.4.  This journey thought me interesting MySQL behavior and bug reporting practices.  In this post, I am sharing both in addition to some insight on Write Set tracking for parallel replication.

Here is the CREATE TABLE of death

In a previous post, I talked about the existence of a CREATE TABLE that is crashing MySQL up to versions 5.5.58, 5.6.38 and 5.7.20, and MariaDB up to version 5.5.57, 10.0.32, 10.1.26 and 10.2.7.  I hope you upgraded (or can mitigate this problem in another way) as I am now publishing the CREATE TABLE of death.

A crashing bug in MySQL: the CREATE TABLE of death (more fun with InnoDB Persistent Statistics)

I ended one of my last posts - Fun with InnoDB Persistent Statistics - with a cryptic sentence: there is more to say about this but I will stop here for now.  What I did not share at the time is the existence of a crashing bug somehow related to what I found.  But let's start with some context.

The danger of no Primary Key when replicating in RBR (and a partial protection with MariaDB 10.1)

TL;DR: unless you know what you are doing, you should always have a primary key on your tables when replicating in RBR (and maybe even all the time).

TL;DR2: MariaDB 10.1 has an interesting way to protect against missing a primary key (innodb_force_primary_key) but it could be improved.

A few weeks ago, I was called off hours because replication delay on all the slaves from a replication chain was high and growing.  It was not the first time this happened on that chain, so I thought right away that this was probably an UPDATE or DELETE of many rows on a table without a primary key.  Let's see what is the problem with this and to understand that, we have to talk about binary log formats.

More Details about InnoDB Compression Levels (innodb_compression_level)

In one of my previous posts, I shared InnoDB table compression statistics for a read-only dataset using the default value of innodb_compression_level (6).  In it, I claimed, without giving much detail, that using the maximum value for the compression level (9) would not make a big difference.  In this post, I will share more details about this claim.

TL;DR: tuning innodb_compression_level is not very useful for my dataset.

Why we still need MyISAM (for read-only tables)

TL;DR: we still need MyISAM and myisampack because it uses less space on disk (half of compressed InnoDB) !

In the previous post, I shared my experience with InnoDB table compression on a read-only dataset.  In it, I claimed, without giving much detail, that using MyISAM and myisampack would result is a more compact storage on disk.  In this post, I will share more details about this claim.

An Adventure in InnoDB Table Compression (for read-only tables)

In my last post about big MySQL deployments, I am quickly mentioning that InnoDB compression is allowing dividing disk usage by about 4.3 on a 200+ TiB dataset.  In this post, I will give more information about this specific use case of InnoDB table compression and I will share some statistics and learnings on this system and subject.  Note that I am not covering InnoDB page compression which is a new feature of MySQL 5.7 (also known as hole punching).

How far can you go with MySQL or MariaDB ?

MySQL theoretical limits are known and they can be found in the manual, they include:

• MyISAM permits data and index files to grow up to 256 TiB by default, but this limit can be changed up to the maximum permissible size of 65,536 TiB (256^7 − 1 bytes).
• The maximum tablespace size depends on the InnoDB page size: 64 TiB for 16 KiB pages.
  (The maximum tablespace size is also the maximum size for a [InnoDB] table.)

But what can be done in practice ?  How far can you go with MySQL or with MariaDB ?

InnoDB Basics - Compaction: when and when not

This is old news for MySQL/MariaDB expert but people that are starting using InnoDB do not always know that disk space is not automatically released when deleting data from a table.  To explain and demonstrate that, I will take two real-world examples: table1 and table2.

Fun with InnoDB Persistent Statistics

Something interesting happened to me in the last days, and it is worth sharing.  I was upgrading MariaDB (MySQL also impacted) to a new major version and mysql_upgrade showed something like this:

[...]
Phase 4/7: Running 'mysql_fix_privilege_tables'
ERROR 1062 (23000) at line 586: Duplicate entry 'schema-table_name#P#partition_name_truncated' for key 'PRIMARY'
ERROR 1062 (23000) at line 590: Duplicate entry 'schema-table_name#P#partition_name_truncated' for key 'PRIMARY'
ERROR 1062 (23000) at line 593: Duplicate entry 'schema-table_name#P#partition_name_truncated' for key 'PRIMARY'
FATAL ERROR: Upgrade failed

Better Replication when running both InnoDB and MyRocks (or other Storage-Engines)

Kristian Nielsen is working on a new feature for MariaDB 10.3 and he published very interesting results.  This feature is MDEV-12179: Per-engine mysql.gtid_slave_pos tables.  He writes about replicating twice as fast in the worst case when using two storage engines (InnoDB and MariaRocks in his tests, but could also be InnoDB and TokuDB or TokuDB and MyRocks).  I will let you read all the details on his blog about Improving replication with multiple storage engines.

Why am I posting this here ?  Mostly because I want to share with you that:

• I am also involved in this project,
• I am working closely with Kristian on this feature,
• and that Booking.com is financing Kristian's time on this development.

If you are also interested in this, feel free to comment in the JIRA MDEV, to leave a comment below, or on Kristian's post.

My two parallel replication talks at Percona Live Santa Clara 2017

Yes, another post about my talks at Percona Live Santa Clara: I obviously still have things to share.  This time, I will focus on my parallel replication talks by giving a short preview.

My talks at Percona Live Santa Clara 2017

In a previous post, I listed all the Booking.com talks at Percona Live.  In this post, I will give more details about my talks.

As a reminder, the list of my talks is the following:

• Monitoring Booking.com without looking at MySQL (Thursday keynote)
• The two little bugs that almost brought down Booking.com (Tuesday Lightning Talk)
• MySQL/MariaDB Parallel Replication: inventory, use cases and limitations (Wednesday talk)
• MySQL Parallel Replication (LOGICAL_CLOCK): all the 5.7 (and some of the 8.0) details (Thursday talk)

I will quickly describe each of them below.

Booking.com talks at Percona Live Santa Clara 2017

In a week, me and some Booking.com colleagues will be in Santa Clara for Percona Live.

Booking.com is sponsoring the conference and we will be present at the Monday Evening Reception.  You do not need a tutorial pass to attend the dinner (even if it is on the tutorial day): any valid pass will do.  If you do not have your ticket yet, it is time to register (you can use the discount code “SeeMeSpeak” for a 10% discount on the registration fees).

Many thanks Oracle for implementing RESET MASTER TO

MySQL 8.0.1 is out and it includes an implementation of my feature request (Bug #77438).  This extension to RESET MASTER allows to simplify master promotion with Binlog Servers.  Let's see how it works:

# mysql -N <<< "SHOW MASTER STATUS"
binlog.027892   3006935
# mysql -N <<< "RESET MASTER TO 12345; DO sleep(rand()*10); SHOW MASTER STATUS"
binlog.012345   92773
# mysql -N <<< "RESET MASTER TO 12345678; DO sleep(rand()*10); SHOW MASTER STATUS"
binlog.12345678 24795
# mysql -N <<< "RESET MASTER TO 1234567890; DO sleep(rand()*10); SHOW MASTER STATUS"
binlog.1234567890       13987
# mysql -N <<< "RESET MASTER TO 12345678901; DO sleep(rand()*10); SHOW MASTER STATUS"
ERROR 3567 (HY000) at line 1: The requested value '12345678901' for the next
binary log index is out of range. Please use a value between '1' and '2147483647'.
# mysql -N <<< "RESET MASTER TO $RANDOM; DO sleep(rand()*10); SHOW MASTER STATUS"
binlog.013529   89880
# mysql -N <<< "RESET MASTER TO $RANDOM; DO sleep(rand()*10); SHOW MASTER STATUS"
binlog.000831   22961
# mysql -N <<< "RESET MASTER TO $RANDOM; DO sleep(rand()*10); SHOW MASTER STATUS"
binlog.023089   107764
# mysql -N <<< "RESET MASTER TO $RANDOM; DO sleep(rand()*10); SHOW MASTER STATUS"
binlog.003433   67903

Many thanks Oracle for implementing my feature request, and a special mention to Daniël van Eeden for providing a patch in the bug report.

Busy April 2017: MariaDB Dev Meeting (no-slave-left-behind, MyRocks, ...) and Percona Live

In a few days, I will start my yearly travel to North America which will bring me at Percona Live at the end of the month.  But I will first stop in New York to attend the MariaDB Developer Meeting.  Let's see what will happen there.

Better InnoDB Crash Recovery in MariaDB 10.1

Recently, I had to go through crash recovery of a large MariaDB 10.1.21 instance.  After starting MariaDB, I started tailing the error logs expecting to wait many minutes while InnoDB was scanning ibd files.  I was surprised (and actually delighted) with this:

A Metric for Tuning Parallel Replication in MySQL 5.7

MySQL 5.7 introduced the LOGICAL_CLOCK type of multi-threaded slave (MTS).  When using this type of parallel replication (and when slave_parallel_workers is greater than zero), slaves use information from the binary logs (written by the master) to run transactions in parallel.  However, enabling parallel replication on slaves might not be enough to get a higher replication throughput (VividCortex blogged about such a situation recently in Solving MySQL Replication Lag with LOGICAL_CLOCK and Calibrated Delay).  To get a faster slave with parallel replication, some tuning is needed on the master.

FOSDEM talks

I will be heading to Brussels on Friday for FOSDEM.

How upgrading MariaDB Server failed because 50M warnings were ignored

This post is part of the series "please do not ignore warnings in MySQL/MariaDB".  The previous post of the series can be found here.

In this post, I will present why ignoring warnings made me lose time in upgrading MariaDB Server.  I think this war story is entertaining to read and it is also worth presenting to people claiming that ignoring warnings is no big deal.